You are here
Home ›Reform or Revolution?
A review of “Trotsky, Trotskyism, Trotskyists” by the Communist Workers’ Organisation of Great Britain
Our comrades from the Communist Workers’ Organisation (CWO) have published, in autumn 2000, an extremely well documented pamphlet on Leon Trotsky and the movement that continues his work and name, Trotskyism.
Since the disappearance of the Soviet Bloc at the end of the 1980’s, the ideologues of the ruling class have been endlessly celebrating the death of Communism and now claim that capitalism represents the unsurpassable horizon of human destiny. Francis Fukayama even proclaimed it to be the “end of history”. If the Western press still lashes out regularly against the totalitarian dinosaurs that are China, North Korea, Vietnam or Cuba, this certainly isn’t to force them to relieve the burden of the horribly exploited workers of these countries, but rather to convince the working class here of the futility of any revolt or hope of revolutionary change. According to our Masters, a clique or a dictatorial and bloody party would inevitably hijack the revolution.
However, the current of the Communist Left, to which we belong, demonstrated a long time ago, that the death of workers’ power, founded by the October 1917 revolution, didn’t date from 1989, but from way back in the 1920’s.
It was caused by the throttling and decisive failure of working class struggles in Europe during that period. As was noted by the great internationalist Rosa Luxembourg:
The question of socialism could only be posed in Russia.
The answer precluded any kind of so-called “national socialism”, completely at odds with the whole theoretical tradition of Marxism. The fate of the revolution depended entirely on its extension to the rest of Europe.
The total isolation of the Russian Revolution thus caused it to pass from the claws of tsarism, to temporary workers’ power only to end up in the trap of a new form of capitalism. A new exploiting class, based on the bureaucrats of the rotting former Communist Party, stripped the workers’ councils of all power. While private ownership of the means of production was abolished, they were not socialised but merely nationalised. Exploitation, money, wage labour and the market continued to exist. Only the Communist Left and some anarchistic currents (1) came to understand that the USSR had become a different form of an essentially capitalist mode of production. But unfortunately, the myth that the Stalinized USSR was socialist or proletarian and an identification of nationalisation with socialism became the grand illusion of an epoch, the pipe dream of many a generation and the tragedy of 20th century.
Trotsky, saviour of socialism?
Because of the horror of Stalinism and its ultimate demise, there exists a whole historical school claiming that the legendary figure of Trotsky, tireless leader of the workers’ councils during the 1905 revolution and martyred by Stalin in 1940, aided by the fragmented succession of his many epigones, preserved the honour of Marxism. The proof of this would be the ostensible opposition of Trotskyism to the horrible travesty of communism, imposed on the working class by Stalinism and the whole slough of its slimy offspring: Titoism, Khrushchevism, Maoism, Eurocommunism, Castroism, Djoutcheism (2), etc. However, the pamphlet of our CWO comrades has the merit of placing the man and his movement in their proper historical and political perspective. Of course, this is not one of those Stalinist collections of fabrications, heavily distributed throughout Canada, by the groups of the “Marxist-Leninist” movement of twenty years ago. (3) Clearly, Trotsky never was the ultra-left “agent provocateur” nor the nazi agent imagined by Stalin’s devoted henchmen.
But, the documentation and arguments of the CWO do demonstrate and prove that Trotsky never was the valiant knight of the anti-bureaucratic struggle, nor a new proletarian Prometheus spitting in the face of the gods of the Stalinist Olympus. Thus, far from being critical of the new Russian state capitalism, Trotsky was, on the contrary, one of the most skilful among its first architects. He did not become a “left oppositionist” until 1923, once his star in the bureaucracy had started to fade. From that time on, Trotsky’s struggle within the Party (i.e. at this point, within the state), took the form of an opposition based on alliances, with or against Stalin, according to his interests at the moment, within the framework of numerous internal struggles of the new “red” bourgeoisie. Even after his expulsion from the USSR, in January 1929, Trotsky obstinately remained, until his death in Coyoacan, Mexico, (4), a fierce defender of the Stalinized capitalist state.
Indeed, to his last breath and in spite of the horrible fate reserved for his family and close relations remaining in the USSR, Trotsky upheld the alleged proletarian character of this state; a workers state that he qualified as “degenerate”, but would call to defend to the bitter end, including by military means. He would write,
The nationalisation of the land, the means of industrial production, transport and exchange, together with the monopoly of foreign trade constitute the basis of the Soviet social structure. Through these relations, established by the proletarian revolution, the nature of the Soviet Union as a proletarian state is for us basically defined. (5)
For Trotsky:
capital could only be capital if it was in private hands. (6)
The exploitation of the Soviet workers did not matter, the internal market did not matter, the appropriation of state power by a body foreign to the proletariat did not matter either, nor did the extreme brutality of its dictatorship. Reality and the principles of Marxism be dammed, Trotsky had definitively resolved the question... The USSR was a workers’ state because of the extent of its nationalisations. However, already in 1878, while writing Anti-Dühring, Friedrich Engels had shown that state property, in and of itself, did not eliminate the capitalist nature of the relations of production. Not only does Marxism recognize that a State can act as a “collective capitalist”, but moreover, it considers that the economic base determines the superstructure of society. The characterization of the capitalist state in the USSR as being a workers’ state was thus flawed from A to Z.
This is no small matter, because it determined Trotsky’s faithful support for the imperialist policies of the USSR and contributed immensely to disorienting and disintegrating the revolutionary workers’ movement. It served as a left cover to the Saturn-like (7) Soviet nomenclature and the counter-revolutionary runts it spawned. The political responsibility of Trotsky for the failure of socialism in the 20th century is thus enormous.
“The great renegade with a peacock’s tail”. That’s how the Italian Fraction of the International Communist Left ended up calling Trotsky. (8) The harshness of this characterization will probably scandalize several Marxists politically nourished at the trough of one of the various stillborn Fourth Internationals, proclaimed by Trotsky in September 1938.
And yet, even the final martyrdom of the ex-revolutionary nearly two years later, could not lessen this appreciation. Whether by entryism (9), imposed on his weak troops after 1934, by his disastrous Spanish policy in 1936, by his Transitional Programme of 1938 (10) or by the many opportunistic zigzags which constitute his theoretical stock in trade, Trotsky put into place all the major aspects of his, ultimately, reformist platform.
For him:
The historical crisis of mankind is reduced to the crisis of the revolutionary leadership. (11)
This formula, taken as gospel by the dispersed rump of his fragmented Fourth International (12), ignores the fundamental conditions allowing the rebirth of the revolutionary workers’ party.
To start off with, it’s a real slap in the face to more than a generation of revolutionary workers who had witnessed in their very lifetime, the passing into the bourgeois camp of two formerly revolutionary leaderships, those of the Second and Third Internationals. Even then, Trotsky still believed these parties could be won for the revolution. This disqualified him and his “International” in advance from offering any leadership to the working class.
This follows from Trotsky’s conception of the revolutionary party. According to him, more than just an important tool, the party assumes the form of a “deus ex machina”, (13) which, by the virtue of its members’ sheer determination and the tactical brilliance of its leadership, must surmount the historic impasse of humanity.
In closing, Trotsky’s conception of the party has as its corollary his defense of the Stalinist system. In one or the other, Trotsky’s presence at the helm would have saved the day... The peacock’s plumage is clearly showing from beneath the master’s frock. Even while covering himself with the feathers of his revolutionary of Trotskyism, past, Trotsky’s legacy to history is that of a would be Stalin.
(1) See for example, the Russian anarchist theorist Archinov
(2) A specifically North Korean expression of “Marxism-Leninism”.
Real anticommunist bogeymen, the petty bosses of Pyongyang have nothing to do with Marx or Lenin.
(3) One can still find some of these at local used bookshops, notable among these are: “Trotskyism: Counter Revolution In Disguise” by M.J. Olgin and by his Canadian counterpart, H.E. Bronson: “The Renegade Revolutionaries”.
(4) He was assassinated by Ramon Mercader, an agent of the GPU, Stalin’s secret police.
(5) Trotsky, The Revolution Betrayed, 1935.
(6) Revolutionary Perspectives, # 20, p34, CWO.
(7) In classical Roman mythology, Saturn, god of agriculture, had the deplorable habit of devouring his own children.
(8) Bilan, # 46, December 1937-January 1938
(9) This term refers to the criminal return to social democracy, accessory to the colossal butchery of 1914- 18, but also to the cowardly assassinations of the leaders of the Spartakist uprising of January 1919, Karl Liebnecht and Rosa Luxembourg.
(10) The original title was: “The Death Agony of Capitalism and the Tasks of the Fourth International: The Mobilization of the Masses around Transitional Demands to Prepare the Conquest of Power.” The book is in fact a plan of ‘radical’ measures not very different from those proposed by his contemporary, the British economist Keynes, (major public works, nationalisation of the banks, etc). The difference being that the subterfuges of Trotsky’s programme were supposed to lead to “the conquest of the masses” at last gathered under the extremely faded banner of his “International”.
(11) Leon Trotsky, the Transitional Program, Labor Publications, 1981.
(12) Even if Canada is not a particularly strong bastion it is interesting to note that the largest organized group of the Canadian “far left” is undoubtedly the International Socialists (I.S.), affiliated to the British Socialist Workers’ Party of the late Trotskyist ideologue Tony Cliff. This group serves as a left cover fort the NDP and has probably outnumbered the fossilized Communist Party. There also exists a whole gamut of other groups claiming the mantle of the ex-revolutionary.
From memory, there are the Communist League (more and more Castroite), Socialist Action, Socialist Alternative, the Trotskyist League, the Bolshevik Tendency, the Communist Workers’ Group, Socialist Challenge/Gauche Socialiste, the Freedom Socialist Party, New Socialist, the Socialist Equality Party and Democracy and Socialism (possibly defunct). Each of these groups claims to defend, as closely as possible, the many zigs and zags of Trotsky’s tortuous political legacy.
(13) Latin phrase meaning “god from the machine”. In ancient Greek theatre, at the end of the play the god would descend to save the day.
Start here...
- Navigating the Basics
- Platform
- For Communism
- Introduction to Our History
- CWO Social Media
- IWG Social Media
- Klasbatalo Social Media
- Italian Communist Left
- Russian Communist Left
The Internationalist Communist Tendency consists of (unsurprisingly!) not-for-profit organisations. We have no so-called “professional revolutionaries”, nor paid officials. Our sole funding comes from the subscriptions and donations of members and supporters. Anyone wishing to donate can now do so safely using the Paypal buttons below.
ICT publications are not copyrighted and we only ask that those who reproduce them acknowledge the original source (author and website leftcom.org). Purchasing any of the publications listed (see catalogue) can be done in two ways:
- By emailing us at uk@leftcom.org, us@leftcom.org or ca@leftcom.org and asking for our banking details
- By donating the cost of the publications required via Paypal using the “Donate” buttons
The CWO also offers subscriptions to Revolutionary Perspectives (3 issues) and Aurora (at least 4 issues):
- UK £15 (€18)
- Europe £20 (€24)
- World £25 (€30, $30)
Take out a supporter’s sub by adding £10 (€12) to each sum. This will give you priority mailings of Aurora and other free pamphlets as they are produced.
ICT sections
Basics
- Bourgeois revolution
- Competition and monopoly
- Core and peripheral countries
- Crisis
- Decadence
- Democracy and dictatorship
- Exploitation and accumulation
- Factory and territory groups
- Financialization
- Globalization
- Historical materialism
- Imperialism
- Our Intervention
- Party and class
- Proletarian revolution
- Seigniorage
- Social classes
- Socialism and communism
- State
- State capitalism
- War economics
Facts
- Activities
- Arms
- Automotive industry
- Books, art and culture
- Commerce
- Communications
- Conflicts
- Contracts and wages
- Corporate trends
- Criminal activities
- Disasters
- Discriminations
- Discussions
- Drugs and dependencies
- Economic policies
- Education and youth
- Elections and polls
- Energy, oil and fuels
- Environment and resources
- Financial market
- Food
- Health and social assistance
- Housing
- Information and media
- International relations
- Law
- Migrations
- Pensions and benefits
- Philosophy and religion
- Repression and control
- Science and technics
- Social unrest
- Terrorist outrages
- Transports
- Unemployment and precarity
- Workers' conditions and struggles
History
- 01. Prehistory
- 02. Ancient History
- 03. Middle Ages
- 04. Modern History
- 1800: Industrial Revolution
- 1900s
- 1910s
- 1911-12: Turko-Italian War for Libya
- 1912: Intransigent Revolutionary Fraction of the PSI
- 1912: Republic of China
- 1913: Fordism (assembly line)
- 1914-18: World War I
- 1917: Russian Revolution
- 1918: Abstentionist Communist Fraction of the PSI
- 1918: German Revolution
- 1919-20: Biennio Rosso in Italy
- 1919-43: Third International
- 1919: Hungarian Revolution
- 1930s
- 1931: Japan occupies Manchuria
- 1933-43: New Deal
- 1933-45: Nazism
- 1934: Long March of Chinese communists
- 1934: Miners' uprising in Asturias
- 1934: Workers' uprising in "Red Vienna"
- 1935-36: Italian Army Invades Ethiopia
- 1936-38: Great Purge
- 1936-39: Spanish Civil War
- 1937: International Bureau of Fractions of the Communist Left
- 1938: Fourth International
- 1940s
- 1960s
- 1980s
- 1979-89: Soviet war in Afghanistan
- 1980-88: Iran-Iraq War
- 1982: First Lebanon War
- 1982: Sabra and Chatila
- 1986: Chernobyl disaster
- 1987-93: First Intifada
- 1989: Fall of the Berlin Wall
- 1979-90: Thatcher Government
- 1980: Strikes in Poland
- 1982: Falklands War
- 1983: Foundation of IBRP
- 1984-85: UK Miners' Strike
- 1987: Perestroika
- 1989: Tiananmen Square Protests
- 1990s
- 1991: Breakup of Yugoslavia
- 1991: Dissolution of Soviet Union
- 1991: First Gulf War
- 1992-95: UN intervention in Somalia
- 1994-96: First Chechen War
- 1994: Genocide in Rwanda
- 1999-2000: Second Chechen War
- 1999: Introduction of euro
- 1999: Kosovo War
- 1999: WTO conference in Seattle
- 1995: NATO Bombing in Bosnia
- 2000s
- 2000: Second intifada
- 2001: September 11 attacks
- 2001: Piqueteros Movement in Argentina
- 2001: War in Afghanistan
- 2001: G8 Summit in Genoa
- 2003: Second Gulf War
- 2004: Asian Tsunami
- 2004: Madrid train bombings
- 2005: Banlieue riots in France
- 2005: Hurricane Katrina
- 2005: London bombings
- 2006: Anti-CPE movement in France
- 2006: Comuna de Oaxaca
- 2006: Second Lebanon War
- 2007: Subprime Crisis
- 2008: Onda movement in Italy
- 2008: War in Georgia
- 2008: Riots in Greece
- 2008: Pomigliano Struggle
- 2008: Global Crisis
- 2008: Automotive Crisis
- 2009: Post-election crisis in Iran
- 2009: Israel-Gaza conflict
- 2020s
- 1920s
- 1921-28: New Economic Policy
- 1921: Communist Party of Italy
- 1921: Kronstadt Rebellion
- 1922-45: Fascism
- 1922-52: Stalin is General Secretary of PCUS
- 1925-27: Canton and Shanghai revolt
- 1925: Comitato d'Intesa
- 1926: General strike in Britain
- 1926: Lyons Congress of PCd’I
- 1927: Vienna revolt
- 1928: First five-year plan
- 1928: Left Fraction of the PCd'I
- 1929: Great Depression
- 1950s
- 1970s
- 1969-80: Anni di piombo in Italy
- 1971: End of the Bretton Woods System
- 1971: Microprocessor
- 1973: Pinochet's military junta in Chile
- 1975: Toyotism (just-in-time)
- 1977-81: International Conferences Convoked by PCInt
- 1977: '77 movement
- 1978: Economic Reforms in China
- 1978: Islamic Revolution in Iran
- 1978: South Lebanon conflict
- 2010s
- 2010: Greek debt crisis
- 2011: War in Libya
- 2011: Indignados and Occupy movements
- 2011: Sovereign debt crisis
- 2011: Tsunami and Nuclear Disaster in Japan
- 2011: Uprising in Maghreb
- 2014: Euromaidan
- 2016: Brexit Referendum
- 2017: Catalan Referendum
- 2019: Maquiladoras Struggle
- 2010: Student Protests in UK and Italy
- 2011: War in Syria
- 2013: Black Lives Matter Movement
- 2014: Military Intervention Against ISIS
- 2015: Refugee Crisis
- 2018: Haft Tappeh Struggle
- 2018: Climate Movement
People
- Amadeo Bordiga
- Anton Pannekoek
- Antonio Gramsci
- Arrigo Cervetto
- Bruno Fortichiari
- Bruno Maffi
- Celso Beltrami
- Davide Casartelli
- Errico Malatesta
- Fabio Damen
- Fausto Atti
- Franco Migliaccio
- Franz Mehring
- Friedrich Engels
- Giorgio Paolucci
- Guido Torricelli
- Heinz Langerhans
- Helmut Wagner
- Henryk Grossmann
- Karl Korsch
- Karl Liebknecht
- Karl Marx
- Leon Trotsky
- Lorenzo Procopio
- Mario Acquaviva
- Mauro jr. Stefanini
- Michail Bakunin
- Onorato Damen
- Ottorino Perrone (Vercesi)
- Paul Mattick
- Rosa Luxemburg
- Vladimir Lenin
Politics
- Anarchism
- Anti-Americanism
- Anti-Globalization Movement
- Antifascism and United Front
- Antiracism
- Armed Struggle
- Autonomism and Workerism
- Base Unionism
- Bordigism
- Communist Left Inspired
- Cooperativism and autogestion
- DeLeonism
- Environmentalism
- Fascism
- Feminism
- German-Dutch Communist Left
- Gramscism
- ICC and French Communist Left
- Islamism
- Italian Communist Left
- Leninism
- Liberism
- Luxemburgism
- Maoism
- Marxism
- National Liberation Movements
- Nationalism
- No War But The Class War
- PCInt-ICT
- Pacifism
- Parliamentary Center-Right
- Parliamentary Left and Reformism
- Peasant movement
- Revolutionary Unionism
- Russian Communist Left
- Situationism
- Stalinism
- Statism and Keynesism
- Student Movement
- Titoism
- Trotskyism
- Unionism
Regions
User login
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License.