I have read the English translation 'Who are we' (Thesis of the Alliance of the Revolutionary Socialists). It is indeed fascinating to see what they had to say. The paragraphs numbered 2, 3 and 8 each mention 'General Assemblies' which of course is a common theme within the 'communist left'. Is there any difference between using them for revolutionary events and then using them for running the economy ? Personally I'm not sure that using them to run the economy would work, if everyone in the assemblies had an EQUAL say in the decision-making. Would such an arrangement be sufficiently efficient to produce all that will be required ? Any boy in a school playground gets to know who are the top dogs, the leading characters, and those are often the most assertive, most vocal and thus the most influential, whether or not what they have to say makes any real sense. Thus it is by no means certain that a general assembly would tend to be guided by concepts akin to those of the communist left nor even by marxism at all, and might actually tend towards a more fascist competitive set of situations. No doubt corrective measures would be recommended in advance to try to avert all that, but they could be swept aside. Some sort of agreed structure, whether or not fully formalised, might work better for an efficient socialist then communist set of arrangements.

Our position is more described here - revsoc.org

but it is only in russian (i hope for a while)

What about economy - most of us believt that total computerization and automatization of production will negelate such problems.

Computer will analyse demand on every good and there will be no need to maka a special votatations: more toys, or more hats

dktz, did u get my idea?