Written by Jock Dominie. £12, 276pp.
The Russian Revolution remains a landmark event in history. For the bourgeois historians, the October Revolution is thought to be a tragedy that set back the achievements of the “democratic” February Revolution, and allowed the Bolsheviks to wreak havoc on their citizens and the world. For the Stalinists, the events of 1917 paved the way for the birth of the USSR, which they point to as a prototypical example of “socialism in one country”. In reality, the February and October Revolutions were both part of the same proletarian revolution.
The book can be ordered by emailing us at uk@leftcom.org and asking for our banking details, or by donating the cost of the publications required via Paypal using the “Donate” button. Postage charges should be added. If in the UK, and paying direct to our bank account, first class postage is free. If via Paypal add £2. For Europe cost of a copy with postage is €20 (EUR), for Australia it is $42 (AUD) and for the USA and anywhere else in the world it is $27 (USD).
I don't think the main issue
I don't think the main issue here is of violence vs non-violence. Rather most environmental groups seem to believe that capitalism can be reformed towards ecological solutions. Hence the tactic of pressuring governments through direct action (regardless if it's non-violent, like with Extinction Rebellion, or violent like with the Earth Liberation Front).
If on the other hand we agree that such suistainable solutions ultimately cannot be achieved within the framework of capitalism, then we start to pose the question of a different mode of production which can only be brought about by, like you say, a change in class power. It's then no longer about small activist groups carrying out actions on behalf of the immense majority, but about a movement of the immense majority in the interest of the immense majority.
Here we have Extinction
Here we have Extinction Rebellion advocating revolution.
From 10.06 " I think we are inevitably talking about revolution"
April 15 they are holding a global protest. They say block cities day after day. Let's see if they can start something which gives room for intervention? I have no idea how many they can mobilise.
Vague calls for revolution
Vague calls for revolution don't amount to much. The 3-point programme they have on their website (rebellion.earth) doesn't pose the question of a different mode of production, it's all about changing government policy.
The climate marches do open room for intervention, but it's already clear the participants are being led down the route of reformism (Green New Deals, Green Job-Creation Schemes, various electoral reforms, etc.).
I thought exactly the same.
I thought exactly the same. What the founder said on the video bears no resemblance to the core principles on th website, other than the non violent approach. I hope to say as much at their meeting.
I think it may attract people who would quickly latch on to the idea that the present system is the root cause of this and other insoluble threats.
It does seem they are going to attempt illegal actions. This perhaps represents some sort of departure from the traditional reformist organisations, but this could be very tame, we will see.
Likely another damp squib trying to get an instant solution when none is on offer. The information they offer needs to be integrated into a wider revolutionary narrative.
I understand how people see the horrendous nature of the threat and the short timescale available to avoid the worst, but the response is somewhat akin to falling out of a plane without a parachute. The impact is coming very soon but no amount of hope, fear, desperation will do away with gravity.
And similarly, there will be no greening of capitalism that averts the crisis which even the mainstream IPCC forecasts depicts.
Destroy the system, not the environment.
The topic could be of
The topic could be of interest for the 6th April meet. No war but class war could perhaps need a perspective on NVDA.
The worst case scenario about Extinction Rebellion is that there is deep state infiltration/ influence and at the moment that the class struggle is about to explode, an interclass movement is being fanned to block it. Sounds a little unlikely, but who would say the ruling class isn't willing to play these games, risk the future just to get by for a little longer.
Destroy the System, Not the Environment.
telegraph.co.uk>
A positive piece of evidence
A positive piece of evidence that NVDA is for middle class tossers?
This article by the ICC looks
This article by the ICC looks accurate to me, though if anyone sees a flaw, please point it out.
the only issue I picked up on was this line - "The movement against global warming is developing in a context of an almost total absence of struggles by the working class, which is also facing a loss of self-confidence and even a loss of its own class identity."
I would say there is ample reason to say that the working class response lags behind the gravity of the situation, but I think that is to be expected. I dont think there is "almost total absence of struggles" but again to be expected, the struggles are imperfect, and not evenly distributed geographically. Quick example from New York Times, April last year "China is a sea of labor unrest. During the first 10 weeks of this year there were more than 400 publicly reported strikes, more than double the number during the comparable period last year. President Xi Jinping’s government has responded with a firm hand: Labor activists are being arrested and assaulted simply for demanding their wages."
Loss of self confidence and class identity? Well, the working class generally subscribes to ruling class ideas outside of acute revolutionary periods so I dont think we have to write off the class because of its temporary ideas about itself which are almost always filtered through bourgeois propaganda.
Despite all the problems I would still say this much, the issue of climate change is extremely important and not one we can leave to the middle-class, regardless of their sexual preferences.
An alternative perspective.
An alternative perspective. Still drastic but disputes the extinction perspective.