Chemical weapons bad, cluster bombs good....imperialist hypocrisy

The international community is not happy with the United States and Saudi Arabia amid news that they have inked a deal for hundreds of millions of dollars of controversial and potentially unethical cluster bombs
The $641 million deal would send 1,300 cluster bombs to America's closest ally on the Arabian Peninsula, through U.S. defense contractor Textron, according to a Pentagon release on the contract.
Cluster bombs are controversial because they are by nature less accurate than more modern munitions. The Human Rights Watch page on cluster bombs puts it this way:
(Cluster munitions) pose an immediate threat during conflict by randomly scattering thousands of submunitions or "bomblets" over a vast area, and they continue to take even more civilian lives and limbs long after a conflict has ended, as hundreds of submunitions may fail to explode upon impact, littering the landscape with landmine-like duds. Presently, a treaty banning cluster bombs has been signed by 112 of the 192 member U.N. states. The U.S. and Saudi Arabia are not signatory.
http://www.businessinsider.com/us-to-sell-cluster-bombs-to-saudi-arabia-...

Comments

So what's wrong with cluster bombs? They are capitalism's perfect weapon and embody all its characteristics. Totally inaccurate and unpredictable they can cause unpleasant and random damage to lots of people who don't even know they're there. And, even when you think its all safe, these deliciously evil bombs can continue destroying and maiming people long after they were first distributed and long after folk had forgotten all about them. They are, to put it mildly, mischievous and, as such, tremendous fun in that their total unpredictability has all the adventure and excitement of the gambling casino. So it isn't surprising that the great casinos known as the US and Saudi Arabia - such holy places too - want to retain the privilege of being able to inflict them on anybody they like - or dislike. And who can blame them? Chemical weapons, on the other hand, are not such fun and offer little in the way of titillating surprise. Limited in action, the only satisfaction to be gained from them is in viewing the films made of the victims of these weapons - many of whom appear to be children - as they suffer the agonies for example, of sarin gas.

Anyway, there's more money to be made from selling cluster bombs than chemical weapons. And that's all that counts isn't it?

Yours sincerely,

A. Free Marketeer.